Why I Open Fire
I’ve been debating on an online list expressing my contention that there is no purely altruistic action. I cited apparent altruistic actions of my own (washing a co-worker’s coffee cup while washing my own dishes ) and explained my own selfish motive for doing so (feeling magnanimous in anticipating someone’s unexpected joy in seeing their dish washed). The argument against altruism is not my own invention, it is central to the Ayn Rand novels which I have read and I had previously read this same idea in a book of philosophy essays in 1997 although I can’t remember the name of that particular writer. The point is whenever I see a person claim an altruistic motive I am inclined to go after them.
What is interesting is that Christianity is big on self denial but many people of the so-called altruistic ilk are either agnostic or people who reject the possibility of a god altogether. These are people who reject religion but who (in my opinion) still embrace the “value” of self-abnegation that was injected into our culture by Christianity itself. In short it is my contention that many of these people reject the possibility of God but are still unconsciously aspiring to be Jesus. Living and dying for the sake of others is a terrible value because the idea is counterproductive both for those who practice it and for the intended beneficiaries of said action AND it induces guilt in those who don’t practice it (unless they’re smart enough to realize what a stupid idea it is.)
How is living for others counterproductive? Let’s say I’m engaged to person A but I meet person B and want to marry her instead. If I live for myself I will marry person B. Person A might end up unhappy but there’s a very real possibility that two people (person B and me) could end up happy. BUT if I value my own happiness less than others I might marry person A anyway. I thus guarantee myself a less than optimal solution (I really wanted person B) AND person A gets the short end of the stick as well. Why? Because if she’s not the one I really wanted the marriage is a lie and that’s going to come into play at some point. She will be stuck with a less than happy husband and the end result is I’ll go play pool all the time until she moves out in frustration. So in living for others I’ve just guaranteed the UNHAPPINESS or at least a less-than-optimal result for two people. So in seeking to serve the interest of another I’ve actually torpedoed us both. You get my point?
Perhaps using myself as an example makes a bad point and does the subject injustice. If you want to read a better example go here and you will find something to make you think. Thanks to Phelps for sending me the link.